IF RED TAPE PREVENTS ME FROM BUILDING, HAS THE GOVERNMENT TAKEN MY PROPERTY?

​At what point does government red tape become so onerous that it amounts to a taking of private property for which the property owner must be compensated under the Fifth Amendment?  That has been a much-discussed question for some time now.  I know that some people say the answer is never, but there are indications that the courts may be heading in the other direction.  
Two recent cases are illustrative.  One is a decision that allows local governments to be sued in state court when a property owner claims that regulations amount to a taking.  The other is a California case involving the imposition of historical review requirements after the property owner was allowed to demolish the purportedly historic building on his property.