Nathan B. Hannah, attorney
  • Home
  • Links
  • Law Blog
  • Music Blog

HEARING FREDDIE FREELOADER AGAIN THIS MORNING REMINDED ME WHAT A GREAT TRACK IT IS

10/30/2015

0 Comments

 
Not only does “Freddie Freeloader” (on Miles Davis’ Kind of Blue album) have what might be Trane’s best solo, I think it also has what might be Miles’ best.  It’s certainly one of his swingingest.  
Cannonball’s solo on that track is great too.  The contrast among the three solos is interesting. 
I guess this means I need to restart blogging on my music blog.
0 Comments

MY OCTOBER UPDATE/SPECIAL REPORT IS AVAILABLE

10/29/2015

0 Comments

 
For your edification and amusement (hopefully), my monthly newsletter has been posted in the publications section of my firm’s web site, deconcinimcdonald.com.  
It’s a twofer this month, in that I found a story that combines two of my favorite subjects, tax and land use law.  There’s also a short item about something that caught my eye on a tax aspect of retirement planning.  You’ll want to read the whole thing, I promise.  
If you would like to receive my newsletter via snail mail, just let me know.  All of my contact information is on the home page of this site, as well as on my bio page at deconcinimcdonald.com.
0 Comments

IF ANYBODY CAN FIGURE OUT WHAT THIS GUY IS SAYING, LET ME KNOW

10/28/2015

0 Comments

 
A French economist is apparently trying to make the argument that an “optimal inheritance tax rate might be as large as 55%-70%,” but I honestly cannot understand any of the rest of the description of his paper.  Maybe you have to be an economist to know what he means by “we estimate simultaneously timing responses in the short and medium-term using an innovative bunching approach” and “we use a difference-in-differences approach to estimate real and shifting among asset portfolio responses.” 
0 Comments

A LITTLE MORE DISCUSSION ABOUT THE COST OF HOUSING 

10/27/2015

0 Comments

 
Further to my post yesterday, I saw another post written by the Antiplanner, but this time at the Cato Institute blog, about the cost of housing.  He points out something that I have noticed but I think is largely overlooked: just because an organization calls itself “non-profit” doesn’t necessarily mean that it doesn’t have highly compensated employees and is expending the majority of its resources on supporting whatever constituency it purports to support.  In some cases at least, the main constituency of such organization is really its own employees.
0 Comments

AN INTERESTING DISCUSSION OF THE COST OF HOUSING AND WHAT DRIVES IT

10/26/2015

0 Comments

 
As usual, the Antiplanner is discussing what causes high housing costs in certain urban areas.  He thinks land use restrictions are a major contributor.  That makes sense to me.
0 Comments

MAKE THE POST OFFICE INTO A BANK?  

10/21/2015

0 Comments

 
​A presidential candidate has brought up the idea, which I have written about in the past, that the Postal Service could expand the services it provides to include consumer financial services.  This idea has been pitched as a way to both improve the availability of small-dollar banking services for consumers and bolster the financial condition of the Postal Service.
Maybe I’m missing something, but if the banks can’t make a profit from providing small-dollar services to consumers, how will the Postal Service make a profit from providing those services?
0 Comments

IF AN ON-LINE CONTACT FROM AN UNKNOWN SOURCE INVITING YOU TO RESPOND SOUNDS FUNNY, IGNORE IT

10/20/2015

0 Comments

 
Recently, we received a solicitation through a web site that sends referrals to my firm.  The web site is run by a first-rate professional organization.  That’s probably why I didn’t immediately reject this solicitation even though I should have.
Why should I have rejected the solicitation?  Because it used the same odd wording as the scam emails that I receive daily.  The emails are from people posing as prospective clients who are looking to scam lawyers.  Several months ago I posted about one such solicitation that got written up in the American Bar Association Journal.
Instead of rejecting the solicitation, I responded as I usually do to contacts through that web site, by sending an email inviting the prospective client to set up a consultation.  When a reply came back with more of the same wording that’s in the scam emails, my suspicions had already been aroused.  I didn’t respond.
I get those scammer emails every day.  I should have known the same junk would start getting to me through other methods soon enough.  
0 Comments

IT’S GOING TO TAKE THEM A WHILE TO DIG OUT OF AN 0-FOR-151 HOLE

10/19/2015

0 Comments

 
​As anyone who understands baseball stats will know, if you go 0-fer long enough, your batting average is never going to recover.  You’ll never get back above the Mendoza line.  That’s what I thought of when I saw this item on the home page of Lowering the Bar today:
​At least temporary congratulations to the three former leaders of Dewey & LeBoeuf, following a mistrial today on no fewer 93 criminal charges. The jury has already acquitted them on 58 other charges that also arose from the bankruptcy and collapse of that ginormofirm, and today said it could not reach agreement on the remaining 93. Does that suggest it might have been overkill to prosecute them for 151 separate crimes? I do not know, but so far the prosecution is 0-151.
I know it’s inside baseball (if I may mix my metaphors), but I have been following the news about Dewey & LeBoeuf with some interest.  Dewey & LeBoeuf was a very large law firm that went out of business a few years ago, leaving a huge amount of unpaid debt.  Three of the executives of the firm (not all of whom were lawyers) ended up getting prosecuted for allegedly misleading the firm’s creditors.  
I think the story is interesting to me mostly because it’s so far removed from my experience as a lawyer.  I can’t get my head around the idea that a law firm would raise capital by selling bonds, as if it was General Motors or General Electric.  
As for the prosecutors who went 0-for-151, will they get sent down to the minors?
0 Comments

I THINK THE THEME HERE IS BANNING WHAT SEEMS LIKE ORDINARY COMMERCE

10/14/2015

0 Comments

 
This post at the Cato blog talks about the burning questions of whether or not state and local governments should protect their citizens from the dangers of self-service gas stations and food trucks by banning those forms of commerce.
The issue with the food trucks was not, apparently, whether they were a health or safety hazard.  No, the issue was their threat to the businesses of restaurant operators.
The self service gas station ban is a mystery to me.  I can’t remember how long ago it was that gas station attendants disappeared around here.  There are places where they still exist?
The food truck ban is obviously protecting the economic interests of a narrow constituency.  The self service gas ban doesn’t seem to have even that justification.  
Why should governments be banning commercial arrangements that are obviously no threat to public health or safety?
0 Comments

JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE HAS AN AGENDA FOR WANTING SOMETHING DOESN’T MEAN THAT THE THING THEY WANT IS WRONG

10/12/2015

0 Comments

 
As I have said before, just because someone has a platform on the internet for expressing his opinions doesn’t mean those opinions have more validity than any others.  And just because some opinionated person comes up with his own reason for wanting something doesn’t necessarily mean that the thing they want is bad.
What am I talking about?  Some people have suggested that if there are self-driving cars, there could be fewer vehicles per capita, since fleets of them could be on hand to be deployed only when called upon.  This would mean less traffic, less pollution, fewer cars being built, and safer streets.  Those are all worthy goals, in my opinion.  
A few commentators have taken the idea one step further and suggested that self driving cars would, if deployed communally and not owned individually, eliminate the need for personally controlled transportation and, consequently, make it possible to eliminate individually driven vehicles.  Naturally, a few commentators have reacted negatively to the suggestion that individual driving would be banned.  
It’s all a bit involved for me.  I’m not going to get into the political implications of it.  I think driverless cars will be good for individuals and for our country.  I’m going to leave it at that.
Via Instapundit.
0 Comments
<<Previous

    Author

    The contents of this blog, this web site, and any writings by me that are linked here, are all my personal commentary. None of it is intended to be legal advice for your situation.
    If you want to read more, take a look at my newsletter archive.

    Archives

    March 2023
    April 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

    Categories

    All
    Estate And Gift Tax
    Estate Planning
    First Amendment
    Income Tax
    Lawyer
    Real Estate
    Tax

      To get updates via email:

    Subscribe to Newsletter

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Links
  • Law Blog
  • Music Blog